Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Cameron has gone it alone.  (Read 257 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ReebokTrotter
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2860



« on: 09 December 2011, 06:48 PM »

Dave showed a big pair of turnips in using the veto to avoid signing another treaty. We are now the pariahs of Europe. The snail scoffers and the Hun want to give it large in Europe. Well let them. We are a small island and it is about time we started to tell Europe to do one.
Logged

Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
Mr Magoo
First Team
*****
Online Online

Posts: 1449



« Reply #1 on: 09 December 2011, 07:19 PM »

Well said, fcuk them all, we will be OK.
Logged

"If you're going through hell, keep going."
ReebokTrotter
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2860



« Reply #2 on: 09 December 2011, 07:22 PM »

Well said, fcuk them all, we will be OK.

I wouldn't go that far. Slowly but surely we will  be isolated from all major decision making in Europe. Ultimately, it may lead to our withdrawal from the European Union. The future is not looking good but we must retain the stiff upper lip and soldier on as only a true Englishman can.
Logged

Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
Weststander
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2005



« Reply #3 on: 09 December 2011, 07:29 PM »

I'm with Magoo, fcúk 'em all. We don't get involved with much decision making as it is. Shove Brussels up their arse.
Logged
ReebokTrotter
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2860



« Reply #4 on: 09 December 2011, 07:37 PM »

Shove Brussels up their arse.

You might be able to squeeze the odd Brussels Sprout where the sun doesn't shine but a whole Brussels is going to rip you a new A hole.
Logged

Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
hjd
Substitute
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 533


« Reply #5 on: 09 December 2011, 08:19 PM »

If it means we stop handing over £51m a day to the EU then I'm all for it
Logged
tomr
Substitute
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 778

"ivan campo...ivan campo"


« Reply #6 on: 09 December 2011, 08:41 PM »

You never know it may even stop anybody from just coming and living here.
Logged
bangerhard
Substitute
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 771



« Reply #7 on: 10 December 2011, 11:08 AM »

Do you think it is a bit strange that the Daily Mail NEVER mentions how much we spend on keeping a so-called Empire, under the terminology of Commonwealth.  The fact is the UK spends approx GBP 120 million a day on keeping a facde going and virtually not getting anything back. Especially as most of our Commonwealth do not trade aor do very little trade with us - their major markets are China, Asia and the US.  That is more than double on what we spend on the EU.  But they are more than  happy on tyelling us about the bad points of being in the EU!  And what about how much we spend on being members of the UN which is approx GBP75 million a day for what?  so that we are just the lap-dogs of the US!!! 

Another problem are the international markets - do you think that China, currently the biggest market in the wrold, will trade with the UK alone, considering how much they are investing into the EU?  What about Asia?  They normally follow China.  Australia's biggest market partner is also China followed by asia and the US and very little trade with UK alone.  US are having a laugh with us and always have done and continually lump us with Europe.  Currently Obama does very little with Cameron because the politics are different.  They may be our so-called "cousins" but interestingly the US does more trade with Russia, than us, the rest of the EU and even China.

At one single "no" we have become isolated but we do not have industry or skills to be isolated.  My own personal thought is that it is going to be tough next few years going it alone.

Not trying to defend the EU here, although it is the better value for money than the UN or the Commonwealth, or any other international "club" we are part of, put together.

The problem the UK now has is that we export more to our EU neighbours than any other international market.  How much more tougher is that going to be, or even how much more expensive is it going to be?  The pound will inevitably get stronger but that is going to cost us export wise as goods become more expensive to sell, how many people will visit the UK as it will become more expensive to visit?  So from a British miopic point of view it is always good to stand up to our European, especially the Germans neighbours but at what cost to us?

Our finances are minutely linked to those of the EU members due to the amount of trade we have.  Basically what happens in the EU, and connecting countries, will inevitably happen in the UK - even as just neighbours, if we were not part of the EU, if the EU suffer we will undoubtedly suffer.

Another point which is not mentioned, are the oil pipelines - they go through the EU, if we are not members how much more will we have to spend on getting oil - there is no point saying we have oil, our oil is far to coarse to be turned into fuel, petrol or diesel hence we have it piped and shipped in.  How much more is it going to cost the UK now that we are no longer part of the inner-sanctum.

Finally the Banks and Bankers (aka The City) - they are primiarily the ones that brought us to where we are by gambling with people's money.  Cameron has defended them, why???  They should be taxed and made to pay for what they have caused since the world finance collapse of 2007.  If it was the fear of Banks moving out of Europe, or even out of the UK where the Banks provide about 60% of our GDP! - why would they do that, why would the Banks not have a presence in a major market - complete nonsense.  Tax or no tax Banks would be stupid to miss out on a major market, thus creating profits and more dividends for their shareholders.  Therefore with this bit Cameron has basically said the Banks can carry on with what they have done for the last 30 years - gambling with no come-back!!!  In fact it is this bit that has well and truly got me pissed off - as Banks, and the city Bankers, are not paying for what they have done - no law changes to protect people's monies, no new taxation against them, and no regulations.  It is now only a matter of time before the Banks destroy British finances completely, unless legislation is created to stop them!
Logged
ReebokTrotter
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2860



« Reply #8 on: 10 December 2011, 11:45 AM »

One of the reasons that Cameron voted No was because France and Germany would not give us any assurances that the financial institutes of the City of London would be protected.

The French will be busily scheming behind the scenes to cause as much damage to to our Financial Services Industry. We have not heard the last of this. The Lib Dems are up in arms but Clegg is a busted flush. The coalition is dead in the water as far as I am concerned.

We are all going to be asked to tighten our belts even more over the coming months, of that, there is no doubt.
Logged

Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
exile in bolton
Reserve
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 134


view from the other side


« Reply #9 on: 11 December 2011, 11:47 PM »

Cant help but think he is just helping his mates in the city.I'm no fan of the E.U or the Euro
the original idea of a commom market was a good one,but it has just become a bloated
bureaucratic monster what needs feeding huge amounts of cash.Think we would be better off
out of it,but not sure whether we would be burning our bridges if we did come out.
Logged

expecting a lot of stick
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC