Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Shithouse steward bastards!!!  (Read 1004 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
traf
Captain Material
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5835



« Reply #25 on: 18 October 2011, 12:57 PM »

I have no idea what a fluffer is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer
Logged

Everybody is a genius. But, if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will spend its whole life believing that it is stupid
Big_Sharps
Legend
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15307



« Reply #26 on: 18 October 2011, 12:57 PM »

City fans deserve to be knocked over, fair play to them.
Logged
ReebokTrotter
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2860



« Reply #27 on: 18 October 2011, 02:34 PM »


I am not impressed with the picture that Wikipedia have chosen to use for their example. I have nowt against uphill gardeners but surely they could have used a picture of some hetero action to explain what a fluffer does. Any young kid going on Wikipedia and seeing this kind of thing could wrongly assume that this kind of stuff is the norm.
Logged

Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
Robbo
New Signing
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4



« Reply #28 on: 18 October 2011, 08:22 PM »

i worked as a steward, at burnden park, and never saw any old guys treated like that,  but like anything else there are a few power mad idiots in police force, stewards etc, think they can treat people how they want too, this was one of the reasons i refused to steward at Reebok, that and all the rules and bullshit!
Logged
Keegan
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2241


Yardie Wanderer


« Reply #29 on: 19 October 2011, 06:36 PM »

That was disgraceful behaviour on the part of the Stewards.
Logged

"I will love the light for it shows me the way, yet I will endure the darkness because it shows me the stars.”
Big_Sharps
Legend
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15307



« Reply #30 on: 20 October 2011, 09:20 AM »

I am not impressed with the picture that Wikipedia have chosen to use for their example. I have nowt against uphill gardeners but surely they could have used a picture of some hetero action to explain what a fluffer does. Any young kid going on Wikipedia and seeing this kind of thing could wrongly assume that this kind of stuff is the norm.

Small minded man!
Logged
ReebokTrotter
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2860



« Reply #31 on: 20 October 2011, 09:35 AM »

One of the actors was obviously in an advanced state of HIV. You only have to look at his legs. Wikipedia are setting a bad example by showing this kind of material.
Logged

Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
Big_Sharps
Legend
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15307



« Reply #32 on: 20 October 2011, 09:42 AM »

You have obviously studied the photo in great detail.
Logged
ReebokTrotter
First Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2860



« Reply #33 on: 20 October 2011, 09:44 AM »

That is the whole point of looking at a photo. Did you notice the decor in the background ? It looks like it was filmed in some cardboard squat.
Logged

Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC