|
Big_Sharps
|
 |
« Reply #225 on: 19 July 2011, 10:29 AM » |
|
Never seen anything like it. If this is a wind up act, then it got boring ages ago, otherwise, well, see Diana's advice on that one.
He does play on it a little but take a look on his facebook and he is the sad desperate loser that he appears in real life. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #226 on: 19 July 2011, 11:17 AM » |
|
He's got real mental problems so I'm not gonna mess with him anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ReebokTrotter
|
|
« Reply #227 on: 19 July 2011, 11:20 AM » |
|
He does play on it a little but take a look on his facebook and he is the sad desperate loser that he appears in real life.
He is a bloody good darts player. He is on tv tonight in the PDC masters. I am having a fiver on him to beat John Henderson. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
|
|
|
|
Natasha Whittam
|
|
« Reply #228 on: 19 July 2011, 11:42 AM » |
|
He does play on it a little but take a look on his facebook and he is the sad desperate loser that he appears in real life.
And yet here are you and Dave stalking him via Facebook and spending your day trying to wind him up. I'm willing to bet you're more of a loser. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fair play to you then if you're willing to share your knickers with a willy.
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #229 on: 19 July 2011, 11:48 AM » |
|
I'm willing to bet you're the only one protecting the identity of a nonce teacher.
In my eyes that makes you a loser. Amongst other things Pope.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Big_Sharps
|
|
« Reply #230 on: 19 July 2011, 11:56 AM » |
|
And yet here are you and Dave stalking him via Facebook and spending your day trying to wind him up.
I'm willing to bet you're more of a loser.
I have not been on his Facebook, I am only going off what Dave told everybody, that is rich you calling anybody a loser. Unless you own Carphone Warehouse you lead a far more dull life than you make out. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #231 on: 19 July 2011, 12:03 PM » |
|
It was Natasha who first mentioned what was on his facebook the other day. She's going to convince Amos she is his friend and then ruin the poor guy again. Remember what she's done to you in the past Chris. Don't let her fúck you up again big lad.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Natasha Whittam
|
|
« Reply #232 on: 19 July 2011, 12:05 PM » |
|
I'm willing to bet you're the only one protecting the identity of a nonce teacher.
In my eyes that makes you a loser. Amongst other things Pope.
Loser? I'm anything but. I've always done exactly what I wanted. How many people can say that. I wanted that teacher and I got him. I'm pretty sure if we were writing our life stories mine would be more of a read than yours. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fair play to you then if you're willing to share your knickers with a willy.
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #233 on: 19 July 2011, 12:08 PM » |
|
Getting raped by a nonce teacher wouldn't be one of my life highlights if it had happened to me like it has you tbh. You're better than me at that one. Well done Pope.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ReebokTrotter
|
|
« Reply #234 on: 19 July 2011, 12:35 PM » |
|
Let's not confuse rape with consensual sex. There is a massive difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #235 on: 19 July 2011, 12:36 PM » |
|
Let's not confuse rape with consensual sex. There is a massive difference.
A 15 year old can't consent in the eyes of the law. It's classed as rape. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Big_Sharps
|
|
« Reply #236 on: 19 July 2011, 12:36 PM » |
|
The law is in place though because those under 16 do not know what is right and wrong in terms of giving consent as their not emotionally mature enough to make the decision.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ReebokTrotter
|
|
« Reply #237 on: 19 July 2011, 12:46 PM » |
|
A 15 year old can't consent in the eyes of the law. It's classed as rape.
Very true. A 15 year old can't consent but it wouldn't be rape. The charge would be unlawful sexual intercourse. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: 19 July 2011, 12:47 PM by ReebokTrotter »
|
Logged
|
Why do we experiment on animals when there are so many lawyers ?
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #238 on: 19 July 2011, 12:51 PM » |
|
Statutory rape is another way to call it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Squidgy
|
|
« Reply #239 on: 19 July 2011, 12:53 PM » |
|
Apart from Dave helping Amos to do an Amos this is probably my favourite thread of all time.
As DP said, strangely compelling reading.
Go Mrs S is what I say, cut his nadgers off while he sleeps.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I have learned never to ridicule any man's opinion, however strange it may seem - ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE - Like fúck I have.
|
|
|
|
Big_Sharps
|
|
« Reply #240 on: 19 July 2011, 12:58 PM » |
|
Apart from Dave helping Amos to do an Amos this is probably my favourite thread of all time.
As DP said, strangely compelling reading.
Go Mrs S is what I say, cut his nadgers off while he sleeps.
Be quiet you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #241 on: 19 July 2011, 01:01 PM » |
|
He's the original victim of girlfriend interference on here. He should be your ally not taking the piss.
Cockney twat.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Natasha Whittam
|
|
« Reply #242 on: 19 July 2011, 01:05 PM » |
|
A 15 year old can't consent in the eyes of the law. It's classed as rape.
Ha ha, you seem obsessed. It was 16 years ago David, let it go. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fair play to you then if you're willing to share your knickers with a willy.
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #243 on: 19 July 2011, 01:06 PM » |
|
I'm right though Pope. The fact he still could be working with kids is a reason not to let it go imo.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jayjay23
|
|
« Reply #244 on: 19 July 2011, 03:06 PM » |
|
Then you shouldn't have had children should you.
You are a case in point as to why people should need a license to have children.
However, if I was your girlfriend I'd be happy you were out of my hair for 10 days...it's not as if you're going to pull is it you fat racist.
****
good post. but dont call him that. Not called for. But imagine having Sharps as your Dad. Poor buggers.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Big_Sharps
|
|
« Reply #245 on: 19 July 2011, 03:56 PM » |
|
At least they have a dad you Orphan.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Ghost of Burnden
|
|
« Reply #246 on: 20 July 2011, 08:31 AM » |
|
According to the Oxford English Dictionary:
Abandon - to go away from (a person or thing or place) without intending to return
now review whats been written and is it abandonment? NOPE!
Dave, it is about time you had some English lessons, as well as psychology mediation
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Bouncebackability.
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #247 on: 20 July 2011, 10:06 AM » |
|
Abandon -
1. to abandon a child; to abandon a sinking ship.
2. to give up; discontinue; withdraw from: to abandon a research project; to abandon hopes for a stage career.
3. to give up the control of: to abandon a city to an enemy army.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Big_Sharps
|
|
« Reply #248 on: 20 July 2011, 10:12 AM » |
|
According to the Oxford English Dictionary:
Ginger Mentalists - Chris Amos
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DaveBWFC
|
|
« Reply #249 on: 20 July 2011, 10:14 AM » |
|
He's telling the truth about not abandoning his daughter though imo.
She doesn't exist to abandon.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
